Breaking the Mold: How the Assembly-Line Approach Transforms AR Workflow (Part 2)

Introducing a Revolutionary Strategy

As healthcare finance becomes increasingly complex, traditional AR workflow strategies are showing their limitations. Enter the Assembly-Line Approach: a revolutionary method that promises to boost efficiency, improve cross-training, and increase overall throughput in revenue cycle management.

Breaking Down the Assembly-Line Approach

This new strategy divides AR workflow into three distinct phases:

Research Phase

  • Gathering supporting documentation
  • Summarizing relevant information
  • Verifying eligibility and authorizations
  • Classifying denials
  • Tracking down the EOB/Remit

Decision Phase

  • Determining appropriate actions (appeal, correct claim, write-off)
  • Leveraging experienced staff expertise
  • Making rapid decisions based on summarized information

Response Phase

  • Executing decided actions
  • Submitting corrected claims or appeals
  • Updating patient accounts
  • Implementing automated responses where appropriate

Benefits of the Assembly-Line Approach
This approach offers several key advantages over traditional methods:

  • Optimized skill allocation: Each phase requires different skills, allowing staff to focus on tasks best suited to their expertise.
  • Improved cross-training in Assembly-Line Approach: Team members can rotate through different phases, broadening their knowledge and skills.
  • Increased throughput: By streamlining the process, organizations can handle a higher volume of claims more efficiently.
  • Measurable output of Assembly-Line Approach: Each phase produces clear, quantifiable results, making it easier to track performance and identify areas for improvement.
  • Automation opportunities: Certain tasks, particularly in the research and response phases, can be automated to further increase efficiency.

Implementing the New Workflow with Assembly-Line Approach
Successful implementation of this approach involves carefully assigning tasks based on skill level and experience:

  • Junior staff or those with extra capacity handle the research phase, gathering all necessary information.
  • Experienced staff members focus on the critical decision-making phase, leveraging their expertise to determine the best course of action for each claim.
  • Designated team members or automated systems execute the responses, ensuring timely follow-up on all decisions.


Organizations implementing the approach have reported significant efficiency gains. Some have increased their daily claim processing capacity from 20-25 to 100 claims. This dramatic improvement stems from the focused allocation of resources and expertise at each stage of the process.

By allowing experienced staff to focus solely on decision-making, organizations can maximize the impact of their most valuable team members. Meanwhile, junior staff gain exposure to a wide range of scenarios, accelerating their learning and development.

You may also like to read